United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper

Third Circuit

United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper

181 F.2d 95, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2562

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1950

Docket10109_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 F.2d 95 (United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Carl Emil Ludwig Krepper, 181 F.2d 95, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2562 (3d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Krepper, invoking the provisions of Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, the so-called “coram nobis” section, seeks to have the court below vacate judgments of conviction and sentence rendered against him. Krepper’s conviction was upheld in an exhaustive opinion filed in this court. See 159 F.2d 958, certiorari denied 330 U.S. 824, 67 S. Ct. 865, 91 L.Ed. 1275. The issues raised by bis present application are adequately disposed of in the opinion of the court below. 86 F.Supp. 862.

The grounds upon which Krepper seeks to set aside the judgments do not suggest that he has been denied constitutional rights. We agree with the ruling of the court below that it was unnecessary to conduct a hearing. The order appealed from will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Krepper, invoking the provisions of Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, the so-called “coram nobis” section, seeks to have the court below vacate judgments of conviction and sentence rendered against him. Krepper’s conviction was upheld in an exhaustive opinion filed in this court. See 159 F.2d 958, certiorari denied 330 U.S. 824, 67 S. Ct. 865, 91 L.Ed. 1275. The issues raised by bis present application are adequately disposed of in the opinion of the court below. 86 F.Supp. 862.

The grounds upon which Krepper seeks to set aside the judgments do not suggest that he has been denied constitutional rights. We agree with the ruling of the court below that it was unnecessary to conduct a hearing. The order appealed from will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 F.2d 95, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carl-emil-ludwig-krepper-ca3-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack