United States v. Carl Edward Long
This text of 32 F.3d 571 (United States v. Carl Edward Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
32 F.3d 571
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Carl Edward LONG, Appellant.
No. 94-1610.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 1994.
Filed: August 1, 1994.
Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Carl Edward Long appeals the sentence imposed by the district court under the sentencing guidelines. Long contends the district court improperly ordered restitution for the amounts attributable to the fraudulent scheme alleged in the indictment instead of limiting restitution to the amount involved in the count of conviction. Long's contention, however, is foreclosed by this court's contrary holding in United States v. Welsand, 23 F.3d 205, 207 (8th Cir. 1994). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 F.3d 571, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28916, 1994 WL 396169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carl-edward-long-ca8-1994.