United States v. Carl Courtright

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carl Courtright. Read the opinion of the Court — 632 F.3d 363
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 13, 2011·No. 09-2880·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 12, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 09‐2880

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

v. No. 3:07‐cr‐30179

CARL A. COURTRIGHT, III, David R. Herndon, Defendant‐Appellant. Chief Judge.

O R D E R

On consideration of the petition for panel rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by Petitioner‐Appellant on March 25, 2011, the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on January 13, 2010, is hereby AMENDED as follows:

Page 4, line 2‐3, delete “desktop” and replace with “computer”

Page 12, line 3, delete “large part” and replace with “portion”

Page 12, line 4, delete “was found guilty by a jury of” and replace with “pled guilty to”

No judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc and the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carl Courtright, (7th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Carl Courtright (United States v. Carl Courtright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.