United States v. Carl Bennett

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carl Bennett. Read the opinion of the Court — 472 F.3d 825
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 12, 2008·No. 07-11316·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 12, 2008 No. 07-11316 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00008-CR-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARL BENNETT,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _________________________

(February 12, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

G. Terry Jackson, appointed counsel for Carl Bennett, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because

independent review of the record confirms counsel’s conclusion that the record

does not contain any potentially meritorious issues for appeal, we GRANT

counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM Bennett’s sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carl Bennett, (11th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Carl Bennett (United States v. Carl Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)