United States v. Carey
This text of 114 F. App'x 917 (United States v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Peter Bernard Carey, Jr. appeals from the sentence imposed on remand for his conviction by guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we vacate and remand for re-sentencing.
United States v. Smith, 387 F.3d 826 (9th Cir.2004), which was published after the district court acted in this case, and which displaces this court’s prior remand, now controls. Thus we vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing in light of Smith. See id. at 834-35.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carey-ca9-2004.