United States v. Cardona-Palacios

223 F. App'x 951
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 2007
DocketNos. 06-15573, 06-15659, 06-15660
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 F. App'x 951 (United States v. Cardona-Palacios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cardona-Palacios, 223 F. App'x 951 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Ruben Cardona-Palacios in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We initially denied counsel’s Anders motion and ordered merits briefing. Counsel subsequently filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the denial of his Anders motion. Upon reconsideration, our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cardona-Palacios’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bobby Alexander Smith v. United States
559 F. App'x 933 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 F. App'x 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cardona-palacios-ca11-2007.