United States v. Cardona-Palacios

223 F. App'x 951
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 11, 2007·No. Nos. 06-15573, 06-15659, 06-15660·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Ruben Cardona-Palacios in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We initially denied counsel’s Anders motion and ordered merits briefing. Counsel subsequently filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the denial of his Anders motion. Upon reconsideration, our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cardona-Palacios’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cardona-Palacios, 223 F. App'x 951 (11th Cir. 2007).

223 F. App'x 951 (United States v. Cardona-Palacios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobby Alexander Smith v. United States
559 F. App'x 933 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)