United States v. Cardona

509 F. App'x 895
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 15, 2013·No. No. 12-12842·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Magaly Cardona in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals no issue of arguable merit for us to consider on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cardonas’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cardona, 509 F. App'x 895 (11th Cir. 2013).

509 F. App'x 895 (United States v. Cardona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)