United States v. Cardona

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cardona

509 F. App'x 895

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 15, 2013

DocketNo. 12-12842

StatusPublished

This text of 509 F. App'x 895 (United States v. Cardona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cardona, 509 F. App'x 895 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Magaly Cardona in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals no issue of arguable merit for us to consider on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cardonas’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tom Dale, appointed counsel for Magaly Cardona in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals no issue of arguable merit for us to consider on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cardonas’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 F. App'x 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cardona-ca11-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack