United States v. Cardenas-Espinoza
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gilberto Cardenas-Espinoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for illegal re-entry after [215]*215deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Cardenas-Espinoza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Cardenas-Espinoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
134 F. App'x 214 (United States v. Cardenas-Espinoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.