United States v. Carbajal

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 2000
Docket99-21045
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Carbajal (United States v. Carbajal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carbajal, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-21045 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO CARBAJAL, also known as Gustavo Carbajal Gomez

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-390-5 -------------------- November 3, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gustavo Carbajal appeals the sentence imposed by the

district court following his jury trial conviction for conspiracy

to transport and harbor undocumented aliens. We review the

district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de

novo, and we review its factual findings for clear error. United

States v. Edwards, 65 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir. 1995).

Carbajal argues that the district court clearly erred in

increasing his base offense level by nine points based on its

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-21045 -2-

factual finding that Carbajal was accountable for smuggling,

transporting, or harboring more than 100 aliens. See U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.1(b)(2)(C). Because this finding is plausible in light of

the record read as a whole, the district court did not commit any

error, clear or otherwise. United States v. Watson, 966 F.2d

161, 162 (5th Cir. 1992).

The judgment of the district court imposing sentence is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joe Clyde Watson
966 F.2d 161 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. William Delmer Edwards, Jr.
65 F.3d 430 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Carbajal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carbajal-ca5-2000.