United States v. Captain
74 M.J. 351
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedApril 7, 2015
DocketNo. 15-0172/MC
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 74 M.J. 351 (United States v. Captain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Captain, 74 M.J. 351 (Ark. 2015).
Opinion
CCA 201800187. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues specified by the Court:
I. WHETHER TRIAL DEFENSE COUNSEL PROVIDED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY FAILING TO OFFER EVIDENCE, OTHER THAN AN UNSWORN STATEMENT, IN EXTENUATION OR MITIGATION AND BY CONCEDING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF A DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE.
II. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED IN AFFIRMING A SENTENCE THAT INCLUDED A DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE WHEN THE CONVENING AUTHORITY’S ACTION DID NOT APPROVE ONE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Pierre
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 M.J. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-captain-armfor-2015.