United States v. Cantu-Cruz
This text of 173 F. App'x 613 (United States v. Cantu-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Monserrat Cantu-Cruz appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), as enhanced by (b)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The parties’ joint motion for a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), is GRANTED and the sentence is REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 F. App'x 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cantu-cruz-ca9-2006.