United States v. Cantu

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2000·No. 99-1273·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1RV Y  !  5$0,52 &$178 s5  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW 1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW IRUWKH:HVWHUQ'LVWULFWRI0LFKLJDQDW*UDQG5DSLGV 1Rn'DYLG:0F.HDJXH'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG$XJXVW 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG2FWREHU %HIRUH1(/621DQG1255,6&LUFXLWsXGJHV0$7,$  &KLHI'LVWULFWsXGJH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  (ODLQH 0LWWOHPDQ )DOOV &KXUFK 9LUJLQLD IRU $SSHOODQW  7LPRWK\ 3 9HU+H\ 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(< *UDQG 5DSLGV 0LFKLJDQ IRU $SSHOOHH 21%5,()(ODLQH0LWWOHPDQ)DOOV&KXUFK9LUJLQLDIRU

7KH +RQRUDEOH 3DXO 5 0DWLD &KLHI 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW sXGJH IRU WKH 1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 2KLR VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ

  8QLWHG6WDWHVY&DQWX 1RV

$SSHOODQW  7LPRWK\ 3 9HU+H\ 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(<*UDQG5DSLGV0LFKLJDQIRU$SSHOOHH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 23,1,21 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 3$8/50$7,$&KLHI'LVWULFWsXGJH'HIHQGDQW5DPLUR &DQWXDSSHDOVKLVFRQYLFWLRQRQRQHFRXQWRIEHLQJDIHORQLQ SRVVHVVLRQ RI D ILUHDUP  86& †  J   RQ WKH JURXQGWKDWWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWLPSURSHUO\GLVPLVVHGDVHDWHG MXURUDQGUHSODFHGKLPZLWKDQDOWHUQDWH%HFDXVHZHILQG WKDWWKHGLVWULFWMXGJHDFWHGZLWKLQKLVDXWKRULW\XQGHU5XOH  F RIWKH)HGHUDO5XOHVRI&ULPLQDO3URFHGXUHZHVKDOO DIILUPWKHGHIHQGDQWjVFRQYLFWLRQ , sXURU1RILOOHGRXWWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWjVVWDQGDUGMXURU LQIRUPDWLRQ IRUP RQ ZKLFK KH DQVZHUHG m\HVl WR WKH IROORZLQJWZRTXHVWLRQVm+DYH\RXHYHUEHHQFRQYLFWHGRID VWDWHRUIHGHUDOFULPHSXQLVKDEOHE\LPSULVRQPHQWIRUPRUH WKDQRQH\HDU"lDQGm,I\HVZHUH\RXUFLYLOULJKWVUHVWRUHG"l s$DW %HFDXVHLWLVQRWWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWjVSUDFWLFHWR DOORZ SDUWLHV WR YLHZ WKHVH LQIRUPDWLRQ IRUPV QHLWKHU DWWRUQH\ ZDV DZDUH RI WKH MXURUjV UHVSRQVHV  'XULQJ WKH FRXUVHRIWKHUHJXODUYRLUGLUHsXURU1RIDLOHGWRUHVSRQG WRWKHIROORZLQJLQTXLU\E\WKH&RXUW +DYHDQ\RI\RXHYHUEHHQLQYROYHGLQDFULPLQDOPDWWHU WKDWFRQFHUQHG\RX"7KLVLQYROYHPHQWFRXOGFRPH DERXWEHFDXVH\RXZHUHDGHIHQGDQWLQDFDVHDQ\RI WKRVHW\SHVRIUROHVZKHUH\RXKDGVRPHFRQWDFWZLWKWKH V\VWHP s$DW 7KHIROORZLQJH[FKDQJHDOVRRFFXUUHGGXULQJYRLUGLUH

 7KLV RSLQLRQ ZLOO UHIHU WR WKH MXURU LQ TXHVWLRQ VROHO\ E\ QXPEHU LQ RUGHU WR SURWHFW KLV SULYDF\ 1RV 8QLWHG6WDWHVY&DQWX 

7+(&2857 $QRWKHULVVXHWKDWZLOOFRPHXSLQWKLV FDVHLVWKHTXHVWLRQRISRVVHVVLRQRIILUHDUPVDQGWKHUH DUHPDQ\RIXVZKRKDYHILUHDUPVRUKXQWRUVRPHWKLQJ RIWKDWQDWXUHDQG,MXVWZRXOGOLNHWRNQRZLIDQ\ERG\ EHORQJVWRDQ\RUJDQL]DWLRQVWKDWUHODWHWRILUHDUPVXVHRU KXQWLQJRUWKLQJVRIWKDWQDWXUH$VVLVWDQW8QLWHG6WDWHV$WWRUQH\@ $OOULJKW'HHUVHDVRQMXVWJRWILQLVKHG:HUH\RXRXW GHHUKXQWLQJ" s8525

7KH JRYHUQPHQW UHTXHVWHG WKH GLVPLVVDO RI WKH MXURU WR RZQVLWXDWLRQPLJKWDIIHFWKLVDELOLW\WREHIDLUDQGLPSDUWLDO ZKLFK WKH GHIHQGDQW REMHFWHG  7KHUHXSRQ WKH &RXUW 5XOHDOORZVDWULDOFRXUWWRWDNHDFWLRQWRREYLDWHWKHQHHG VXPPRQHG sXURU 1R  LQWR WKH FRXUWURRP IRU IXUWKHU WRJUDQWDQHZWULDODWDODWHUVWDJHRIWKHSURFHHGLQJVDQG TXHVWLRQLQJ7KHIROORZLQJGLVFXVVLRQWRRNSODFH s$DW WKXVIXUWKHUVWKHJRDORIHQVXULQJDIDLUWULDODQGFRQWULEXWHV   WRWKHHIILFLHQWXVHRIMXGLFLDOUHVRXUFHV'HIHQGDQWKDVIDLOHG WR GHPRQVWUDWH DQ\ SUHMXGLFH WR KLP UHVXOWLQJ IURP WKH 7+(&2857 3OHDVHEHVHDWHGLQWKHMXU\ER[>sXURU VXEVWLWXWLRQRIWKHDOWHUQDWHMXURU 1R@ $FFRUGLQJO\WKHGLVWULFWFRXUWjVMXGJPHQWLVDIILUPHG 7KHFRXUWKDVEHHQDGYLVHGE\WKHFRXUWVWDIIWKDW\RX KDYHLQGLFDWHGWRWKHFRXUWVWDIIWKDW\RXIDLOHGWRUHYHDO WKDW\RXKDGEHHQSUHYLRXVO\FRQYLFWHGRIDFULPHLVWKDW FRUUHFW" s8525

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cantu, (6th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Cantu (United States v. Cantu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.