United States v. Canterbury
This text of United States v. Canterbury (United States v. Canterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20285 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-184-ALL --------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Richard Lee Canterbury has
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Canterbury has not filed a
response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Canterbury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-canterbury-ca5-2006.