United States v. Cannon

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

United States v. Cannon

2 M.J. 699, 1976 CMR LEXIS 691

CourtU S Air Force Court of Military Review

DecidedNovember 9, 1976

DocketACM 22097

StatusPublished

This text of 2 M.J. 699 (United States v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U S Air Force Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cannon, 2 M.J. 699, 1976 CMR LEXIS 691 (usafctmilrev 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The accused stands convicted, pursuant to mixed pleas, of two specifications each of housebreaking and larceny and one specification of wrongful possession of marihuana. The approved sentence extends to bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year and eight months, total forfeiture and reduction in grade to airman basic.

We perceive no merit in the three assignments of error submitted by appellate defense counsel. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

The accused stands convicted, pursuant to mixed pleas, of two specifications each of housebreaking and larceny and one specification of wrongful possession of marihuana. The approved sentence extends to bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year and eight months, total forfeiture and reduction in grade to airman basic.

We perceive no merit in the three assignments of error submitted by appellate defense counsel. Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 M.J. 699, 1976 CMR LEXIS 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cannon-usafctmilrev-1976.