United States v. Canez
This text of 305 F. App'x 430 (United States v. Canez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Benjamin Canez appeals from the 25-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Canez contends that it was unreasonable for the district court to impose an above-Guidelines range sentence pursuant to the departure provision set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Note 3, and that the sentence is also unreasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We conclude that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 986-87 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-canez-ca9-2008.