United States v. Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia

712 F. App'x 668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2018
Docket16-50401
StatusUnpublished

This text of 712 F. App'x 668 (United States v. Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia, 712 F. App'x 668 (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Candelario Gonzalez-Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 72-month sentence imposed upon remand following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gonzalez-Garcia argues for the first time on appeal that the government breached the terms of the parties’ plea agreement by failing to honor its promise to advocate for a minor role adjustment at sentencing. The government argues that Gonzalez-Garcia waived this claim. We decline to decide whether Gonzalez-Garcia waived his breach claim because, even if merely forfeited, Gonzalez-Garcia cannot show plain error. 1 See United States v. Whitney, 673 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2012). Any breach by the government did not affect Gonzalez-Garcia’s substantial rights. See United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar, 718 F.3d 1185, 1187 (9th Cir. 2013). The record reflects that the district court understood the arguments in favor of a minor role adjustment, but did not find them convincing and would not have granted the reduction even if the government had argued for it more strenuously. Furthermore, the record reflects that, even if the court had been convinced to grant a minor role adjustment, it would not have imposed a lower sentence. Under these circumstances, there is no reasonable probability that the alleged breach affected the court’s sentencing determination. See id. at 1188-89.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Though we need not decide whether the government breached the plea agreement, we do not approve of its lukewarm support for its joint recommendation for a minor role adjustment as contemplated by the plea agreement,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Whitney
673 F.3d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Ubaldo Gonzalez-Aguilar
718 F.3d 1185 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-candelario-gonzalez-garcia-ca9-2018.