United States v. Cancino

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50419

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESUS CASTANEDA CANCINO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-93-CR-424-8

- - - - - - - - - -

January 13, 1996

Before KING, GARWOOD and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* This is a direct appeal of a guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. The appellant argues that his guilty plea was not knowing or voluntary; that the district court erred in failing to make specific fact findings concerning the quantity of marijuana that was reasonably foreseeable to him under Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; and that the district court erred in not ordering the Government to produce his coconspirators' debriefing statements for inspection.

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 95-50419

-2-

We find that appellant waived the right to appeal his sentence and do not consider the sentencing issue raised by appellant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm appellant's conviction.

AFFIRMED.