United States v. Canadian American Company, Inc.

202 F.2d 751, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 442, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3469
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 1953
Docket22583
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 F.2d 751 (United States v. Canadian American Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Canadian American Company, Inc., 202 F.2d 751, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 442, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3469 (2d Cir. 1953).

Opinion

202 F.2d 751

53-1 USTC P 9286

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant,
v.
CANADIAN AMERICAN COMPANY, Inc., James Albert Wigmore, Pearl
Johnstone Wigmore, Westbury Farm & Land Corporation, William
E. Sheene, Jr., National Munitions Company, Eldred,
Pennsylvania, Clyde M. Guild, as Liquidation Agent, National
Munitions Company, Eldred, Pennsylvania, Town of North
Hempstead and Sadie Schwartz, Defendants, The Incorporated
Village of Old Westbury and County of Nassau,
Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

No. 178, Docket 22583.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 11, 1953.
Decided April 1, 1953.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Homer R. Miller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Frank J. Parker, U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., for United States of America, plaintiff-appellee-appellant.

J. Oakey McKnight, Mineola, N.Y., for Village of Old Westbury, defendant-appellant-appellee.

G. Burchard Smith, County Atty. of Nassau County, Mineola, N.Y., Francis J. Donovan, Deputy County Atty., Mineola, N.Y., of counsel, for Nassau County, defendant-appellant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court, 108 F.Supp. 206.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramón Quiñones v. Secretary of the Treasury
77 P.R. 100 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 F.2d 751, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 442, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-canadian-american-company-inc-ca2-1953.