United States v. Campos

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2022·No. 21-51191·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-51191 Document: 00516398210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED July 18, 2022 No. 21-51191 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joseph Rey Campos,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:19-CR-218-1

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Joseph Rey Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Campos has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-51191 Document: 00516398210 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2022

No. 21-51191

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of Campos’s appeal. See United States v. Pesina- Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campos, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Campos (United States v. Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Manuel Pesina-Rodriguez
825 F.3d 787 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)