United States v. Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2024·No. 24-40095·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 24-40095 Document: 38-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED September 10, 2024 No. 24-40095 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Dale Campbell, Jr.,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-120-1 ______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Dale Campbell, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Campbell has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-40095 Document: 38-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2024

No. 24-40095

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campbell, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Campbell (United States v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)