United States v. Campbell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7612
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
URIAH ST. AUBYN CAMPBELL, a/k/a Jamaican Tony,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-96-25)
Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Uriah St. Aubyn Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Uriah Campbell seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Furthermore, Campbell has failed
to demonstrate that the Government impeded his efforts to file a §
2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Campbell, No. CR-96-25 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 1998).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Campbell (United States v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.