United States v. Camilo Juarez-Rodriguez

498 F.2d 7, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8526
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 21, 1974·No. 74-1118·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

On May 6, 1974, this case was ordered submitted for decision on June 3, 1974. That order is vacated, and the case is ordered submitted for decision today.

On September 20, 1973, Border Patrol agents at the San Clemente immigration checkpoint on interstate route 5, approximately 66 miles from the Mexican border, made a routine stop of a station wagon driven by appellant. The agents searched the station wagon and found 244 pounds of marihuana in the luggage well and spare tire well. No claim is made that the agents had a “founded suspicion” to justify stopping appellant’s vehicle, see, e. g., United States v. Jaime-Barrios, 494 F.2d 455 (9th Cir. 1974) ; United States v. Bugarin-Casas, 484 F.2d 853 (9th Cir. 1973), or probable cause to search the vehicle, see Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925).

Appellant moved to suppress the marihuana. His motion was denied. He then reserved his right to renew the motion, waived jury trial, and proceeded to trial upon stipulated facts. He was convicted of possessing marihuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S. C.§ 841(a)(1) (1970).

In the absence of founded suspicion and probable' cause, the stop and search of appellant’s vehicle at the San Clemente alien checkpoint violated appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights. Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U. S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973); United States v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960, 962-967 (9th Cir. May 9, 1974). Evidence concerning the stop, search, and discovery of marihuana should therefore have been suppressed.

Since the stop and search in this case took place after June 21, 1973, the date *8 on which the Supreme Court decided Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, supra, the non-retroactivity of that decision as applied to fixed alien checkpoints, see United States v. Bowen, supra, at 975-982, need-not concern us.

The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Camilo Juarez-Rodriguez, 498 F.2d 7, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8526 (9th Cir. 1974).

498 F.2d 7 (United States v. Camilo Juarez-Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related