United States v. Cameron
This text of 56 F. App'x 627 (United States v. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Miron H. Cameron appeals the thirty-month custodial sentence the district court imposed after revoking his supervised release. Cameron contends his sentence is unreasonable as it exceeded the eight-to-fourteen month sentence suggested under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4, p.s. (2000). We affirm.
Our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion by the district court in imposing Cameron’s sentence. See United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 642 (4th Cir.1995) (providing standard of review). The district court was presented with the nature and extent of Cameron’s violations, the worksheet providing the recommended sentencing range of § 7B1.4(a), and the three-year maximum sentence. In light of the fact that the district court was perfectly within its province to depart from that recommended range in light of its prior decision to depart downward based on Cameron’s prior substantial assistance, see § 7B1.4, comment, (n.4), we reject Cameron’s argument.
Accordingly, we affirm Cameron’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cameron-ca4-2003.