United States v. Camarillo-Tello
This text of 49 F. App'x 155 (United States v. Camarillo-Tello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Samuel Camarillo-Tello appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He disputes the district court’s decision to make a two-level downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, rather than a four-level departure as recommended by the Government. However, we lack jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court’s downward departure. See United States v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Dickey, 924 F.2d 836, 838 (9th Cir.1991); United States v. Vizcarra-Angulo, 904 F.2d 22, 23 (9th Cir.1990). We, therefore, dismiss Camarillo-Tello’s appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-camarillo-tello-ca9-2002.