United States v. Camacho
This text of 94 F. App'x 638 (United States v. Camacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Agustín Chino Camacho appeals his jury trial conviction and 210-month sentences for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, and possession of a listed chemical, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Camacho has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Camacho has filed pro se supplemental briefs. However, our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and his pro se supplemental briefs, discloses no grounds for relief.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F. App'x 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-camacho-ca9-2004.