United States v. Calvin Slade, A/K/A Big Man

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Calvin Slade, A/K/A Big Man

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23188, 1995 WL 373156

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 1995

Docket95-6222

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 168 (United States v. Calvin Slade, A/K/A Big Man) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Calvin Slade, A/K/A Big Man, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23188, 1995 WL 373156 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Calvin SLADE, a/k/a Big Man, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6222.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

Calvin Slade, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Office of The United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Slade, Nos. CR-91-54; CA-94-147-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Calvin SLADE, a/k/a Big Man, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-6222.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.

Calvin Slade, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Office of The United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Slade, Nos. CR-91-54; CA-94-147-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23188, 1995 WL 373156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-calvin-slade-aka-big-man-ca4-1995.