United States v. Calhoun

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Calhoun

278 F. App'x 888

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 2008

DocketNo. 07-14607

StatusPublished

This text of 278 F. App'x 888 (United States v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Calhoun, 278 F. App'x 888 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, counsel for Carlos Fontez Calhoun, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdrawn is GRANTED and Calhoun’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Appellant’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, counsel for Carlos Fontez Calhoun, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdrawn is GRANTED and Calhoun’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Appellant’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 F. App'x 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-calhoun-ca11-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack