United States v. Caldwell

2 U.S. 333, 25 F. Cas. 238, 1 L. Ed. 404, 2 Dall. 333, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 355
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1795·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

2 U.S. 333 (____)
2 Dall. 333

THE UNITED STATES
versus
CALDWELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

*334 Rawle, the District Attorney, objected.

BY THE COURT: — We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subpœna has been actually served. The practice must always *335 be strict in the previous stages of the business, before an attachment can be awarded; and all the documents, upon which it is awarded, must be filed with the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Caldwell, 2 U.S. 333, 25 F. Cas. 238, 1 L. Ed. 404, 2 Dall. 333, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 355 (1795).

2 U.S. 333 (United States v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Taveras
436 F. Supp. 2d 493 (E.D. New York, 2006)
United States v. Sampson
335 F. Supp. 2d 166 (D. Massachusetts, 2004)
United States v. O'Driscoll
229 F. Supp. 2d 370 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
United States v. Walker
910 F. Supp. 837 (N.D. New York, 1995)
Conover v. Montemuro
477 F.2d 1073 (Third Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Isaac Davenport
312 F.2d 303 (Seventh Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Soblen
203 F. Supp. 542 (S.D. New York, 1961)
Tuder v. Material Service Corp.
177 F. Supp. 71 (N.D. Illinois, 1959)
Otto v. Levy
244 A.D. 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Gilbert L. Thompson v. William Selden
61 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1858)