United States v. Caldwell
This text of 2 U.S. 333 (United States v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE UNITED STATES
versus
CALDWELL.
Supreme Court of United States.
*334 Rawle, the District Attorney, objected.
BY THE COURT: We have no hesitation in granting the indulgence of a delay for a few days. The cause may, therefore, be continued 'till this day week; and, in the meantime, let the attachment issue; but it can only be in the case, in which the subpna has been actually served. The practice must always *335 be strict in the previous stages of the business, before an attachment can be awarded; and all the documents, upon which it is awarded, must be filed with the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 U.S. 333, 25 F. Cas. 238, 1 L. Ed. 404, 2 Dall. 333, 1795 U.S. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-caldwell-scotus-1795.