United States v. Caldwell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 F.3d 623
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1996·No. 96-10280·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-10280 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG E. CALDWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CR-95-T - - - - - - - - - - April 24, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Craig E. Caldwell appeals from the district court's order

denying his motion for release pending trial. The district

court's decision rests on its conclusion that Caldwell is a

danger to any other person or the community and that no

conditions will reasonably assure safety. That conclusion is

supported by the record. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d

580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 940 (1993).

Caldwell has also filed a motion for release pending appeal. The

motion is DENIED, and the district court's detention order is

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Caldwell, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Caldwell (United States v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mauricio Rueben and Gerardo Guerra
974 F.2d 580 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)