United States v. Calderon-Mendivil
This text of 294 F. App'x 297 (United States v. Calderon-Mendivil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Francisco Calderon-Mendivil appeals from his 30-month sentence for conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens and harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii), (a)(1)(A)(v)(I), and (a)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Calderon-Mendivil contends that the district court clearly erred in applying a four-level upward adjustment, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5)(B), for brandishing a firearm. He contends that the evidence did not support a finding that a firearm was used to intimidate the victims. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1, cmt. n. 1(C).
Calderon-Mendivil also contends that the district court clearly erred by denying a two-level reduction, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b), for his minor role in the offense. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Calderon-Mendivil failed to show he was substantially less culpable than other participants in the offense. See United States v. Rodriguez-Cruz, 255 F.3d 1054, 1059-60 (9th Cir .2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-calderon-mendivil-ca9-2008.