United States v. Cajado

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cajado

699 F. App'x 918

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 30, 2017·No. No. 16-17188 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cajado’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cajado’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cajado, 699 F. App'x 918 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

699 F. App'x 918 (United States v. Cajado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related