United States v. Cagle
This text of United States v. Cagle (United States v. Cagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA l L E n
MAR @B ZUlG
C|erk, U.S. District ana Bankruptcy Courts
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
V.
HOWARD E. CAGLE,
) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 05-00400-01 (PLF/AK) ) Defendant. ) )
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MODIFICATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE At a hearing held on March 2, 2010, all parties consented to the modification of
Defendant’s conditions of supervised release and there being no objection thereto, accordingly on this 2nd day of March, 2010, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Defendant’s conditions of supervised release be modified to include: The Defendant shall participate and complete no more than 180 days in the Residential Reentry Center placement as directed by the United States Probation Off`lce; cost to be waived. ln addition, the Defendant will be released to the 3"’ party
Custody of the United States Probation Off`ice upon designation to the Residential Reentry
Center. W" h
ALAN KAY % UNITED sTATEs MA ISTRATE JUDGE
Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this
report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (l985).
The Magistrate Judge having recommended that the conditions of Defendant’s supervised
release be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted.
DATED:QY\¢¢~¢ -5/ ,2010 €3.~(
UNITED STATES Dl§i'§lcr CoURT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cagle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cagle-dcd-2010.