United States v. Cagle

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 8, 2010
DocketCriminal No. 2005-0400
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Cagle (United States v. Cagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cagle, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA l L E n

MAR @B ZUlG

C|erk, U.S. District ana Bankruptcy Courts

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

V.

HOWARD E. CAGLE,

) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 05-00400-01 (PLF/AK) ) Defendant. ) )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MODIFICATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE At a hearing held on March 2, 2010, all parties consented to the modification of

Defendant’s conditions of supervised release and there being no objection thereto, accordingly on this 2nd day of March, 2010, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the Defendant’s conditions of supervised release be modified to include: The Defendant shall participate and complete no more than 180 days in the Residential Reentry Center placement as directed by the United States Probation Off`lce; cost to be waived. ln addition, the Defendant will be released to the 3"’ party

Custody of the United States Probation Off`ice upon designation to the Residential Reentry

Center. W" h

ALAN KAY % UNITED sTATEs MA ISTRATE JUDGE

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this

report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (l985).

The Magistrate Judge having recommended that the conditions of Defendant’s supervised

release be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted.

DATED:QY\¢¢~¢ -5/ ,2010 €3.~(

UNITED STATES Dl§i'§lcr CoURT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Cagle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cagle-dcd-2010.