United States v. Cabe

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 2005
Docket05-7117
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Cabe (United States v. Cabe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cabe, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7117

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHNNY WILLIAM CABE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-00-301)

Submitted: December 9, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny William Cabe, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger, Anne Hunter Young, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Johnny William Cabe, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial pursuant

to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Cabe, No. CR-00-301

(D.S.C. June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Cabe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cabe-ca4-2005.