United States v. C. Keith Lamonda

455 F. App'x 930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. C. Keith Lamonda. Read the opinion of the Court — 384 F. App'x 944
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 2012·No. 11-13012·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for C. Keith LaMonda in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court’s denial of LaMonda’s motion for miscellaneous relief and its final judgment of forfeiture are AFFIRMED, and La-Monda’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. C. Keith Lamonda, 455 F. App'x 930 (11th Cir. 2012).

455 F. App'x 930 (United States v. C. Keith Lamonda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)