United States v. Byron Spears

152 F. App'x 553
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2005
Docket05-3658
StatusUnpublished

This text of 152 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Byron Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Byron Spears, 152 F. App'x 553 (8th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

*554 PER CURIAM.

In this criminal case, Byron Spears appeals the district court’s 1 judgment denying his motion for a downward departure based on poor health. We lack jurisdiction, however, because Spears filed his notice of appeal well beyond ten days after the order denying relief, and even if his pleading could be construed as civil in nature, his notice of appeal was filed more than sixty days after the dispositive ruling. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Stute Co., 402 F.3d 820, 822 (8th Cir.2005) (timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional). Accordingly, the motion for appointment of counsel is denied, and we dismiss this appeal. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byron-spears-ca8-2005.