United States v. Byron Maurice Foster, A/K/A Bryan Maurice Foster, A/K/A Christopher Rooks
This text of 52 F.3d 322 (United States v. Byron Maurice Foster, A/K/A Bryan Maurice Foster, A/K/A Christopher Rooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 322
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Byron Maurice FOSTER, a/k/a Bryan Maurice Foster, a/k/a
Christopher Rooks, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 95-6230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 18, 1995.
Byron Maurice Foster, Appellant Pro Se.
Paul Thomas Farrell, Asstistant United States Attorney, Huntington, W VA, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Foster, No. CR-92-22 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 322, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17594, 1995 WL 227308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byron-maurice-foster-aka-bryan-mau-ca4-1995.