United States v. Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A "B"

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39088, 1996 WL 10297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1996
Docket95-7107
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (United States v. Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A "B") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A "B", 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39088, 1996 WL 10297 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Byron JONES, a/k/a Carl Lee, a/k/a "B", Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7107.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 11, 1996.

Byron Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-92-153-P; CA-95-109-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 14, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Jones v.
226 F.3d 328 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
In Re: Byron Jones, A/K/A Carl Lee, A/K/A B, Movant
226 F.3d 328 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39088, 1996 WL 10297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byron-jones-aka-carl-lee-aka-b-ca4-1996.