United States v. Byers

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Byers

668 F. App'x 479

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 30, 2016

DocketNo. 16-6825

StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 479 (United States v. Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Byers, 668 F. App'x 479 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[480]*480Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Mario Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to renew his motion of acquittal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 2:02-cr-00077-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[480]*480Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Mario Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to renew his motion of acquittal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 2:02-cr-00077-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-byers-ca4-2016.