United States v. B.V.J.

401 F. App'x 299
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2010·No. No. 10-30047·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant, a juvenile, appeals from the sentence imposed following his true-plea to an act of juvenile delinquency, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 5031, that constituted aiding and abetting burglary, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a); 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a), (b). Appellant was sentenced to official detention for 14 months and to supervision following his release from official detention until his eighteenth birthday. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The record reflects that the district court conducted the requisite “assessment of the totality of the unique circumstances and rehabilitative needs” of appellant. United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787 (9th Cir.2003). Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion by failing to impose the “least restrictive means to accomplish [appellant’s] rehabilitation.” Id.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. B.V.J., 401 F. App'x 299 (9th Cir. 2010).

401 F. App'x 299 (United States v. B.V.J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Juvenile
347 F.3d 778 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)