United States v. Butts
This text of United States v. Butts (United States v. Butts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-313 D.C. No. Appellee, 9:22-cr-00033-DWM-1 v. MEMORANDUM* SHAWN LEE BUTTS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2026**
Before: SILVERMAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Shawn Lee Butts appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his guilty-plea conviction for being a prohibited person in possession of firearms
and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Butts asserts that § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment, both facially
and as applied to him as a purportedly non-violent felon who possessed the
firearms for hunting purposes. This claim is foreclosed. See United States v.
Duarte, 137 F.4th 743, 750 (9th Cir. 2025) (en banc) (“[Section] 922(g)(1) is
constitutional as applied to non-violent felons[.]”), cert. denied, __ S. Ct. __, 2026
WL 135692 (U.S. Jan. 20, 2026).
AFFIRMED.
2 23-313
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Butts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-butts-ca9-2026.