United States v. Butterfield
This text of 212 F.2d 794 (United States v. Butterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
212 F.2d 794
UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Theodore ABBENANTE,
Relator-Appellant,
v.
James W. BUTTERFIELD, District Director, United States
Department of Justice, Immigration and
Naturalization Service, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12007.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
April 28, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Levin, Judge.
I. B. Fried, Howell Leuck, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
Fred W. Kaess, U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before MILLER, Circuit Judge, and GOURLEY and STARR, District Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was heard on the briefs, record, and argument of counsel for the respective parties;
And the Court being of the opinion that on the record before the Court the judgment of the District Court is not erroneous for the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion of May 20, 1953, 112 F.Supp. 324.
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 F.2d 794, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-butterfield-ca6-1954.