United States v. Butler

17 C.M.A. 344, 17 USCMA 344, 38 C.M.R. 142, 1967 CMA LEXIS 192, 1967 WL 4396
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 22, 1967·No. No. 20,447·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge:

This case involves the same issue as that presented in United States v Lincoln, 17 USCMA 330, 38 CMR 128, this day decided. Here, the trial counsel also sought to impeach the accused’s trial testimony by use of his pretrial, in-custody statements without any showing of compliance with Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 16 L ed 2d 694, 86 S Ct 1602 (1966), and United States v Tempia, 16 USCMA 629, 37 CMR 249. This was prejudicial error. United States v Lincoln, supra.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing may be ordered.

Judge Kilday concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, 17 C.M.A. 344, 17 USCMA 344, 38 C.M.R. 142, 1967 CMA LEXIS 192, 1967 WL 4396 (cma 1967).

17 C.M.A. 344 (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
United States v. Tempia
16 C.M.A. 629 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Lincoln
17 C.M.A. 330 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)