United States v. Butler
This text of 17 C.M.A. 344 (United States v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
This case involves the same issue as that presented in United States v Lincoln, 17 USCMA 330, 38 CMR 128, this day decided. Here, the trial counsel also sought to impeach the accused’s trial testimony by use of his pretrial, in-custody statements without any showing of compliance with Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 16 L ed 2d 694, 86 S Ct 1602 (1966), and United States v Tempia, 16 USCMA 629, 37 CMR 249. This was prejudicial error. United States v Lincoln, supra.
The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing may be ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 C.M.A. 344, 17 USCMA 344, 38 C.M.R. 142, 1967 CMA LEXIS 192, 1967 WL 4396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-butler-cma-1967.