United States v. Butler

144 F. App'x 339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 F. App'x 798
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Nos. 05-6447, 05-6495·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for correction of sentence under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 36 and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Butler, No. CR-91-44 (Jan. 27, 2005; Mar. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, 144 F. App'x 339 (4th Cir. 2005).

144 F. App'x 339 (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.