United States v. Butler
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6447
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-6495
JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-44)
Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions for correction of sentence under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 and for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Butler, No. CR-91-44 (Jan. 27, 2005; Mar. 15, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.