United States v. Butler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 F. App'x 798
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2005·No. 05-6447·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6447

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-6495

JAMES A. BUTLER, a/k/a Willie James Butler, a/k/a John Thomas, a/k/a Grady,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-44)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions for correction of sentence under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 and for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Butler, No. CR-91-44 (Jan. 27, 2005; Mar. 15, 2005). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, (4th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.