United States v. Butler
This text of United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES A. BUTLER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-91-44)
Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997
Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-
tion for reconsideration of the court's order denying his Fed. R.
Crim. P. 41(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Butler, No. CR-91-44 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Butler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-butler-ca4-1997.