United States v. Bustamante

714 F. App'x 965
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 28, 2018·No. No. 17-12250 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). Furthermore, and in any event, Appellant Bustamante’s unconditional guilty plea waived her right to challenge the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress. United States v. Ternus, 598 F.3d 1251, 1254 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Charles, 757 F.3d 1222, 1227 n.4 (11th Cir. 2014); United States v. McCoy, 477 F.2d 550, 551 (5th Cir. 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bustamante, 714 F. App'x 965 (11th Cir. 2018).

714 F. App'x 965 (United States v. Bustamante) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mauricio Grinard-Henry
399 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Ternus
598 F.3d 1251 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Michael W. McCoy
477 F.2d 550 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Jean Baptiste Charles
757 F.3d 1222 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)