United States v. Bustamante

714 F. App'x 965
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2018
DocketNo. 17-12250 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 714 F. App'x 965 (United States v. Bustamante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bustamante, 714 F. App'x 965 (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). Furthermore, and in any event, Appellant Bustamante’s unconditional guilty plea waived her right to challenge the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress. United States v. Ternus, 598 F.3d 1251, 1254 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Charles, 757 F.3d 1222, 1227 n.4 (11th Cir. 2014); United States v. McCoy, 477 F.2d 550, 551 (5th Cir. 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mauricio Grinard-Henry
399 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Ternus
598 F.3d 1251 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Michael W. McCoy
477 F.2d 550 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Jean Baptiste Charles
757 F.3d 1222 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 F. App'x 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bustamante-ca11-2018.