United States v. Busack

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Busack

670 F. App'x 810

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2016·No. No. 16-6761·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark C. Busack appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to authorize payment of restitution from Busack’s inmate account and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United State v. Busack, No. 5:15-cr-00054-FEP-JES-1, 2016 WL 1559599, 2016 WL 3039886 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 18 & May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark C. Busack appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to authorize payment of restitution from Busack’s inmate account and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United State v. Busack, No. 5:15-cr-00054-FEP-JES-1, 2016 WL 1559599, 2016 WL 3039886 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 18 & May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Busack, 670 F. App'x 810 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 810 (United States v. Busack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.