United States v. Burton

218 F. App'x 366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Burton. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 F.3d 1008
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2007·No. 06-50684·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Karole D. Burton, formerly federal prisoner # 03618-180, seeks a certificate of *367 appealability to challenge the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. She also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).

In her § 2255 motion Burton challenged the one-year prison term that the district court imposed after revoking the supervised release that she was serving for her conviction of theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641.

To obtain a COA, Burton must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See § 2253(c)(2); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). During the pendency of this appeal, Burton was released from prison. Burton’s claims have been rendered moot by her release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir.1987). Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. COA and IFP are DENIED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Burton, 218 F. App'x 366 (5th Cir. 2007).

218 F. App'x 366 (United States v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)