United States v. Burton

70 M.J. 353, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 823
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedSeptember 20, 2011
DocketNo. 10-0685/AF
StatusPublished

This text of 70 M.J. 353 (United States v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burton, 70 M.J. 353, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 823 (Ark. 2011).

Opinions

CCA S31682. On further consideration of the granted issues, 69 M.J. 403 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and the briefs of the parties, it is ordered that the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for consideration of the granted issues in light of United States v. Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), United States v. Blazier, 69 M.J. 218 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and United States v. Blazier, 68 M.J. 439 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and to determine whether the erroneous admission of the cover memorandum and specimen custody document of the drug testing report was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sweeney
70 M.J. 296 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2011)
United States v. Blazier
69 M.J. 218 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2010)
United States v. Blazier
68 M.J. 439 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 M.J. 353, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burton-armfor-2011.