United States v. Burston
This text of 475 F. App'x 939 (United States v. Burston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals district court orders denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012). We dispense with oral [940]*940argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F. App'x 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burston-ca4-2012.