United States v. Burston

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burston

475 F. App'x 939

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 21, 2012·No. No. 12-6970·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals district court orders denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012). We dispense with oral [940] argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals district court orders denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012). We dispense with oral [940] argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burston, 475 F. App'x 939 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

475 F. App'x 939 (United States v. Burston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.